Monday, January 29, 2007
In the interests of full disclosure
An Anoymous reader just sent this in.
-Pat
***************************************
I just used the "Contact Us" link from this page,
http://energycommerce.house.gov/cmte_mtgs/110-oi_hrg.013007.LANL.shtml
to send the following:
__________________________________________
Gentlemen:
If I may suggest, in the interests of full disclosure regarding problems at Los Alamos National Laboratories you might want to browse the following blog: LANL, The Corporate Story, http://lanl-the-corporate-story.blogspot.com/ for topics to question Dr. Anastasio about tomorrow. A recommended list of issues which LANL staff may not have brought to your attention, but which require addressing includes
XXXX,
LANL, Retired
-Pat
***************************************
I just used the "Contact Us" link from this page,
http://energycommerce.house.gov/cmte_mtgs/110-oi_hrg.013007.LANL.shtml
to send the following:
__________________________________________
Gentlemen:
If I may suggest, in the interests of full disclosure regarding problems at Los Alamos National Laboratories you might want to browse the following blog: LANL, The Corporate Story, http://lanl-the-corporate
- Was former Associate Director John Mitchell's sudden recent departure related to any personal security infractions?
- Has LANS accurately been accounting the number of reportable accidents at LANL? And finally,
- Should your subcommittee not be considering a recommendation for terminating the LANS contract for cause in favor of a management arrangement for LANL that is described here: http://lanl-the-corporate
-story.blogspot.com/2007/01 /white-knight-to-rescue -lockmart-saves.html
XXXX,
LANL, Retired
Comments:
<< Home
Bravo!
You be assured that the official LANL version of conditions here will go something like this:
"Problems? Well, sure, we have a few minor issues, but we have them all under control. That LANL, The Corporate Story Blog? Oh, that's just a few hightly vocal malcontents. Please ignore it. We've already made *huge* improvements at LANL."
You be assured that the official LANL version of conditions here will go something like this:
"Problems? Well, sure, we have a few minor issues, but we have them all under control. That LANL, The Corporate Story Blog? Oh, that's just a few hightly vocal malcontents. Please ignore it. We've already made *huge* improvements at LANL."
# posted by 
: 1/29/2007 8:09 AM
: 1/29/2007 8:09 AM
Will the hearings be all for show, or could substantive changes at LANL result from them: that is the big question. Unfortunately, after having watched the Nanos hearings in 2004, I have almost no doubt that these hearings will be little else than a venue for Dingell, Stupak, Sell, D'Agostino and the rest to grab some air time.
Still, I'll be watching. I am not planning to have a large breakfast, however, in anticipation of the nausea that will undoubtedly result from what I anticipate will be a vapid, empty, ass-covering exercise.
Post a Comment
Still, I'll be watching. I am not planning to have a large breakfast, however, in anticipation of the nausea that will undoubtedly result from what I anticipate will be a vapid, empty, ass-covering exercise.
# posted by : 1/29/2007 10:13 AM
: 1/29/2007 10:13 AM << Home
